雅思寫作話題及范文:Write about the following topic:Creative artists shou...

雅思寫作話題及范文:Write about the following topic:Creative artists shou...

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish.

There should be no government restrictions on what they do.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

您應(yīng)該在這項(xiàng)任務(wù)上花費(fèi)大約40分鐘。

寫下以下主題：

創(chuàng)意藝術(shù)家應(yīng)始終享有以任何方式表達(dá)自己想法（文字、圖片、音樂或電影）的自由。

政府不應(yīng)該限制他們的行為。

你在多大程度上同意或不同意這個(gè)觀點(diǎn)？

給出你的答案的理由，并包括你自己的知識(shí)或經(jīng)驗(yàn)中的任何相關(guān)例子。

至少寫250個(gè)單詞。

范文

What can be created in sudden but last forever? And what can you give to ohers but you do not have any? Hard question but simpleanswers: one is art; the other is freedom. Obviously, art calls for talents, passion, dedication and most essentially, freedom. In fact, artis to governmental restriction what chains are to slave dancers.

To measuer treasures of human;society, it can be divided into two aspects: material and spiritual. Undoubtly, art is more vital thanany other spiritual mode. By constrast, few people and governments respect art as high as it should be. When it comes to art, averagepeople will regard it as a fashional or even fancy budge, but not valuable treasures of mankind, let alone understanding and thenrespecting the masterpiece of works.

Wha's worse is that some authourities make all efforts to limit the normal improvement of fine arts. For one thing,they hold that artcannot boost or trigger the economic and social developments. For another thing, it is no use purchasing art activities, for it cannotchange the present situation of living materially. However, it is evidently wrong to attribute art to vulgar materialism. Art dose bringpeople spiritual consolation, directly and indirectly.

Therefore,no matter which standpoint you may agree, giving art reasonable and continous supports is the best way to socialdevelopment, human process and cultual continuity. I qute a classic sentence from a famous article entitled "Give Me Liberty or GiveMe Death"by Patrick Henry，the greatest writer in American history，"I know not what course others may take; but as for me，giveme liberty or give me death！ "

什么東西能在突然之間創(chuàng)造出來，卻能永遠(yuǎn)持續(xù)下去？你能給其他人什么但你沒有？這個(gè)問題很難回答，但答案很簡(jiǎn)單：一是藝術(shù)；另一個(gè)是自由。顯然，藝術(shù)需要天賦、激情、奉獻(xiàn)，最本質(zhì)的是自由。事實(shí)上，藝術(shù)家對(duì)政府的限制就像枷鎖對(duì)奴隸舞者一樣。

衡量人類的財(cái)富；社會(huì)，它可以分為兩個(gè)方面：物質(zhì)和精神。毫無疑問，藝術(shù)比任何其他精神模式都更重要。相反，很少有人和政府對(duì)藝術(shù)的尊重達(dá)到應(yīng)有的高度。說到藝術(shù)，一般人都會(huì)把它視為一種時(shí)尚甚至花哨的舉動(dòng)，而不是人類的寶貴財(cái)富，更不用說理解和尊重作品的杰作了。

更糟糕的是，一些權(quán)威機(jī)構(gòu)竭盡全力限制美術(shù)的正常發(fā)展。一方面，他們認(rèn)為藝術(shù)不能促進(jìn)或觸發(fā)經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)發(fā)展。另一方面，購(gòu)買藝術(shù)活動(dòng)是沒有用的，因?yàn)樗鼰o法改變物質(zhì)生活的現(xiàn)狀。然而，把藝術(shù)歸于庸俗的唯物主義顯然是錯(cuò)誤的。藝術(shù)直接或間接地給人們帶來精神慰藉。

因此，無論你同意哪種觀點(diǎn)，給予藝術(shù)合理和持續(xù)的支持是社會(huì)發(fā)展、人類進(jìn)程和文化延續(xù)的最佳方式。我引用了美國(guó)歷史上最偉大的作家帕特里克·亨利（PatrickHenry）的一篇著名文章《要么給我自由，要么給我死》（Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death）中的一句經(jīng)典句子：“我不知道別人會(huì)走什么路；但對(duì)我來說，要么給我自由，要么給我死！”

>> 雅思 托福 免費(fèi)測(cè)試、量身規(guī)劃、讓英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)不再困難<<