12月2日雅思大作文真題參考范文-是否該禁止商店售賣有害健康的食物？

12月2日雅思大作文真題參考范文-是否該禁止商店售賣有害健康的食物？具體的內(nèi)容和中國(guó)教育在線平臺(tái)一起來看看吧

12月2日雅思大作文真題參考范文 | 是否該禁止商店售賣有害健康的食物？

Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drink that has been scientifically proved to be bad for people’s health. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

高分范文及解析

Introduction

With people’s concern over healthful eating growing, some propose an outright ban on unhealthy food and beverage. Personally, I regard such proposal as unreasonable and infeasible despite its good intent.

解析

老題重現(xiàn)，站不同意，因?yàn)橛薪^ 對(duì)詞“any”。另外也曾有過相似話題討論：保持居民健康飲食是政府責(zé)任還是個(gè)人責(zé)任?本題的“禁止商店售賣有害食品”就是“政府采取的特定措施”。題看多了，就能把觀點(diǎn)融會(huì)貫通。

? outright adj. 完全的，徹底的

? intent n.[U] 目的，意圖

Body 1

Admittedly, it is justifiable for some to advocate such policy, since maintaining the well-being of community members cannot count solely on citizens themselves, and external conditions - additional policies and regulations - may also be in need. To this end, store owners, as social members, should feel obliged to take certain actions. Once shops are forbidden to sell unhealthy food and drink, such as cigarettes and alcohol, which usually render individuals easily addicted to it, people who lack self-discipline to resist the temptation will have no access to those siren calls. In this case, they will be forced to lead a healthier diet.

解析

讓步：商店不售賣此類產(chǎn)品 → 人們沒有渠道接觸此類有害食物 → 促進(jìn)更健康的飲食，尤其對(duì)那些自控力差的人來說是福音

? count on v. 指望;依靠

? oblige sb. to do sth. [常作被動(dòng)]〔因形勢(shì)、法律、義務(wù)等關(guān)系而〕非做…不可，迫使

? render vt. [常用于貶義語境] 使成為;使變得;使處于某種狀態(tài)

? self-discipline n.[U] 自我約束，自律

? resist the temptation 抵制誘惑

? siren call n. 危險(xiǎn)的誘惑 (= temptation)

Body 2

However, such a policy is highly likely to be a nanny-state regulation, as it develops into excessive governing and thus violates people’s liberty. As a matter of fact, most adult citizens are aware of what they feed themselves on as well as of the consequences of consuming those unhealthy products. They may appreciate the good intent behind this ban but get annoyed by the excessive interference. / Besides, though some goods have been scientifically proved to be harmful to human’s health, the results may to a large extent depend on the intake. In other words, if individuals restrain the intake of those oily or sugary products which usually offer people personal satisfaction, they are less likely to suffer from the diseases listed on the research findings, but an outright ban may deprive citizens of such satisfaction.

解析

反駁：1. 剝奪了某些喜愛者的自由;2. 有時(shí)候所謂的“有害”，取決于攝入量

? nanny-state n. [貶] 保姆政府

? feed oneself on/with sth. 喂養(yǎng)

? interference n. 干涉;干預(yù)

? deprive sb. of sth. 剝奪某人某物

04

In a nutshell, shops should be permitted to sell those legal products, and it is individuals themselves that decide what to eat and drink.

解析

重申觀點(diǎn)：商店正常售賣合法產(chǎn)品，個(gè)人決定買不買。

以上就是12月2日雅思大作文真題參考范文-是否該禁止商店售賣有害健康的食物？的相關(guān)內(nèi)容。更多內(nèi)容請(qǐng)繼續(xù)關(guān)注中國(guó)教育在線外語頻道。

>> 雅思 托福 免費(fèi)測(cè)試、量身規(guī)劃、讓英語學(xué)習(xí)不再困難<<