too much emphasis has been put on going to university for academic study 雅思寫作7分范文

雅思寫作大作文題目

Nowadays,too much emphasis has been put on going to university for academic study.We should encourage more people to receive vocational training(like plumbers and electricians)because of the need for trades.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

如今，太多的注意力被放在上大學接受學術教育上。處于貿易的需要，我們應該鼓勵更多的人接受職業(yè)教育（如伐木工和電氣師）。你在多大程度上同意或者不同意？

雅思寫作大作文范文

開頭段

It goes without saying that society always needs a skilled workforce to function.Employees of different professions contribute differently to the thriving of the community,and therefore I disagree with the statement that vocational courses should be given any more weight than before.

社會總是需要熟練勞動力才能運轉。不同職業(yè)的員工為社區(qū)的繁榮做出不同的貢獻，因此我不認為職業(yè)教育應該受到比之前更多的重視。

重視大學教育帶來的問題

The fact that many people deem it more important to take tertiary education than a vocational training program has resulted in a shortage of qualified workers.It is universally accepted that knowledge and qualifications gained from the university can help one to have a head start over other candidates when it comes to job hunting.In China,for instance,a majority of high school graduates are content to spend four to five years more studying at a university with the hope of a bright career ahead.This results in a lack of skilled manual workers such as plumbers and electricians in society.

許多人認為大學教育比職業(yè)教育更加重要的這一事實造成有資質的勞動力的短缺。人們普遍認為在大學里獲得的知識和技能能夠幫助一個人在尋找工作的時候領先他人一步。例如，在中國，大部分高中畢業(yè)生都會在大學里繼續(xù)學習四年或者五年，希望能夠擁有光明的職業(yè)前景。這導致諸如伐木工、電工等熟練體力工人的短缺。

鼓勵職業(yè)教育的缺陷

However,if we encourage more people to become blue-collar workers,then there will be a shortage of white-collar workers who may otherwise create more wealth for society.For example,fewer engineers would mean lower productivity;a dearth of scientists may inhibit scientific discoveries which can provide us with a better life in the future.In contrast,those doing blue-collar jobs may face redundancy when too many applicants compete for the same position.An unbalanced workforce might,therefore,hold society back from development in the long term.

然而，如果我們鼓勵更多的人成為藍領工人，那么就會出現(xiàn)白領的短缺。這些人本可以為社會創(chuàng)造更多的財富。例如，更少的工程師意味著更低的生產力；缺少科學家可能會阻礙未來造福生活的科學發(fā)現(xiàn)。相比之下，當太多的人競爭同一崗位時，那些做著藍領工作的人可能迎來裁員。因此，不平衡的勞動力可能會在長期影響社會的發(fā)展。

結論

In conclusion,the workforce will adjust itself to cater for the need of the community,so there is no need to direct young people to follow a particular career path.

總的來說，勞動力能夠自我調節(jié)以滿足社會的需要，所以沒有必要指導年輕人選擇特定的職業(yè)路線。

>> 雅思 托福 免費測試、量身規(guī)劃、讓英語學習不再困難<<